On Thursday 24 May 2007, Sasvata Chatterjee wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to reply. Yeah, I know the version is old. We > have a telecom embedded system we inherited and there is a lot of code and > too few worker-bees. We are constrained by 2.4.9 kernel, which in turn > dictates what versions of GCC/GLIBC are usable for a PowerPC-603e target. > Per Dan Kegel's crosstools site, there is no encouraging news here, seems > like we are stuck with old compilers/lib unless we upgrade to 2.6.x kernel > (too many driver-level changes, and therefore person-months of testing, for > this to be viable for us at this time). Reality puts a damper on things > :-(
then using an older version of busybox is probably the easiest solution for you -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
