Hi Paul, I somehow missed your original post.
> > someone was asking me whether the implementation of dpkg in > > busybox was useful and/or complete enough to use in any sort > > of a product environment. We are using BusyBox's dpkg in our Access Server product. It's complete and stable enough for production environment. > dpkg.c, however, has been getting recent bugfixes. I think most of them are submitted by me. :-) > > works? if the space were available, would using the "real" > > dpkg be a better idea? Yes. For example, you can't create deb-file with BusyBox (ok, you can, manually with tar + ar), you can only install them. BusyBox is also missing support for md5 check. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
