On 5/31/07, Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IIRC Hal did once post a patch that added verbs support to dhcpd (not > our udhcp). Not sure if this was added to upstream.
How did that work? Did it use verbs to do the communication to get an address, then use that to run through the dhcp-script? Do you by any chance have a location for this post/patch? > > I never tried the combination of ipoib and the busybox udhcpd/udhcpc, > unfortunately.. Since i'm usually not using IP, i'd recommend you to > have a more detailed look into the issue yourself if you need IP. Yep. We have already started looking into this. It looks as though we have to write the packet header ourselves as detailed by RFC 4391 (broadcasting over IB is different then ethernet). Also, it appears as all of the dhcp clients (at least that we tried) seem to have this problem except for the patched ISC version posted by Moni Levy at: http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/2006-April/000329.html Thanks! Greg -- Greg Kurtzer http://www.runlevelzero.net/ _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
