I can only tell about my personal experience (as a user) if I compile 1 busybox with telnetd,crond,httpd,lash,hush,free and I will type free I will get less mem then if I create separated httpd,lash,telnetd,inetd etc etc the difference is so big that i split (almost) all the busybox applets in small parts so if mem is really important (and since I only have 4MB free it is) I advise to split them
I advise to make the same test yourself so you will know for sure what the best option is but I’m curious for the experts advise on this matter -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alex Kums Verzonden: donderdag 21 juni 2007 18:50 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Busybox & memory Hi. I have a question about memory usage in busybox. Say, busybox eat 100 Kb of memory. If I run telnetd, cron and httpd, will these three instances of busybox eat 300 Kb ? Thanks. ----- Туристический портал VP.BY - 'Все Путевки': каталог турфирм Беларуси, отдых на море, туры по Европе, отдых в Беларуси. Есть ГОРЯЩИЕ туры! http://vp.by/ - здесь выбирают ОТДЫХ и делятся впечатлениями! _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
