mån 2007-07-02 klockan 00:11 +0200 skrev Denis Vlasenko: > On Sunday 01 July 2007 21:56, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > sön 2007-07-01 klockan 18:41 +0200 skrev Denis Vlasenko: > > > > > BTW, udhcp code needs more love, that's for sure. > > > > > > > Gauntlet and challange taken! All the more since I will > > > I tried to address some of those in recent commits. > > Returning to pidfile problem... where it happens? > -- > vda
I will work on a pidfile patch this afternoon, since I for various reasons had to build a new buildroot instance on which to try the code alterations. On the other hand, a quick check concerning the type in_addr demonstrates that the headers of glibc 2.3.6 as well as uClibc 0.28.3 uses uint32_t for in_addr, it is only the manpages that are seriously outdated. Another quick glance in the udhcp-directory of Busybox-svn indicates that it is only dhcpc.h and dhcpc.c that are suffering from the use of 'long' for 'uint32_t' in ip-addresses. I will begin to review and alter those parts of the code and produce a patch to correct them. Let me declare this mail thread for closed. New subject next time. Best regards, Mats E A _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
