On Thursday 06 September 2007 17:49, Natanael Copa wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 20:21 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Hi Natanael, > > > > On Tuesday 04 September 2007 18:33, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > While porting openbsd's sendbug I realized that busybox vi is in /bin > > > and not in /usr/bin where I would expect an application like vi. > ... > > Let me think about it till tomorrow. > > Do you know what you want? (I wonder if i should my revert my patch for > my local build)
I feel that software generally shouldn't depend on where binaries are, and should just use PATH. Users (admins) should have freedom to decide what does to /bin, and what to /usr/bin. (btw I don't really understand why busybox has --install option, I do it with shell script, but I won't remove --install) -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox