Bernhard Fischer wrote: > > hm. I'm pretty sure that we mached coreutils behaviour at one time (when > i last touched nohup). I did not really test it thoroughly, but i have > the impression that my > $ nohup --version > nohup (GNU coreutils) 5.97 > behaves like what was implemented back then. Perhaps you can check > against that version, too (both the pristine busybox version as well as > your new coreutils version)?
Thanks for your reply. I just compared my test with coreutils-5.97, the results are identical as coreutils-6.9. Maybe you wrote the inital version against an even older version? By "pristine busybox version" you mean busybox-1.9.0 without my patch applied? That's what I tested with in the first place. Christoph _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
