What was intentional, Mike? To move device node while leaving a symlink to it? Or to not account the basename of new device node location?
If a user orders a certain device (and symlink) to be named MYTIMER why mdev doesn't respect this? -- Vladimir 2008/3/29, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 28 March 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On Friday 28 March 2008 20:01, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Of course I can give an example: > > > > > > --- > > > timer root:audio 660 >snd/TIMER > > > --- > > > ( Note the symbols case of rename clause. ) > > > > > > Current SVN mdev moves /dev/timer to /dev/snd/timer and leaves symlink > > > /dev/timer -> snd/timer. Note, not TIMER but timer... > > > > You mean > > > > timer root:audio 660 >snd/anything > > > > moves /dev/timer to /dev/snd/timer, and > > > > timer root:audio 660 >snd/anything/ > > > > moves /dev/timer to /dev/snd/anything/timer. > > > > first one seems to be a bug, second one is ok. > > it was intentional behavior so people could get "make a symlink" or "move" > at > the same time without having to create extra code. sometimes it does leave > a > slightly messier /dev, but so what ? > -mike > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
