On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:02:38PM +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 27 Apr 2008 at 12:39, Luciano Rocha wrote: > > Date sent: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:39:40 +0100 > From: Luciano Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Operation of more command > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:25:16PM +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > I'm the current developer of g4l, and it has used busybox before I took > > > over, > > > and has been excellent. I have just noticed one issue involving the more > > > command. The g4l project is a bootcd for disk imaging, and doesn't make a > > > lot of use of the more command, but there are times when checking things > > > would make more a nice option, but both the busybox and even the one > > > from Fedora 8 seem to work just like cat. In looking at the code of the > > > more.c, it appear it acts like cat under some situations. It works fine > > > when > > > run under the Fedora environment, but from the cd, it does the same with > > > a > > > local terminal or if telnetted in. So, not sure what would be missing > > > that > > > would case it to act in this manner. > > > > What about busybox's less? Does it work better? > > Tried adding less to the busybox build, and it does the same thing. > In looking at the code, it does a return bb_cat(argv) in code.
Hm... Is your input/output a tty? What does the command "tty" output? Also, ls -l /proc/self/fd -- lfr 0/0
pgpwXGvzPwcrI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
