On Wednesday 04 June 2008 12:32, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Sorry, what I meant to say is that the resulting addition of mdevd > > to the busybox binary would only add a few kilobytes to its size. > > and as things are today, your "tiny" addition results in much more overhead > than udevd. busybox is one big blob and every instance of it (regardless of > what applet it's invoking) means a unique instance of that big blog in > memory.
Not related to mdev: I am trying to fix it by (1) seriously reducing the size of data+bss and (2) making libbusybox build option work ewll for those poor souls who sits on arch which is incapable of reusing text+rodata segment of loaded executables. I need some feedback if these efforts don't work well. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
