On Friday 11 July 2008 17:25, Alex Owen wrote: > Hi there, Thanks for your response. > > I had done some checking and done a binary chop search of svn to find > when the code had changed, and looked at the latest released tag in > svn. I purposefully did not submit a bug report as I thought a > discussion would be nore usefull and it proves it was as you have made > me think again! Thanks! > > Looking again at rfc2616 section 6.2 I see that it is only the last > part of the string that is server dependant > > My parsing code can therefore look for: > "server returned error: HTTP/1.1 404"
Or better "HTTP/nums_and_dots 404" > The "Not Found" is not mandatory according to the RFC. > > I know know what I need to submitt to the debian installer as a patch. Wait a second. What is "debian installer"? Are you saying there is some part of Debian distribution which works with normal wget but fails with busybox wget? -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox