On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 05:59:58PM -0400, Poly-p man wrote: >uclibc's regexp code is 53k by itself.
There are 2 regexp in uClibc, which one are you talking about? > >Since things like expr, awk, etc. need it, I was wondering if it was >even feasible to consider writing our own miniature, >just-what-we-need-and-no-more regexp code, possibly implementing that as >an option or whatever. > >I could do some work on this, but I'd like some input from the mailing >list first. I don't think this makes sense, improve uClibc instead, i'd say. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
