On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: >Hi Bernhard, > >El Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:57:13PM +0200 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ha dit: > >> ... >> >> Care to resend? > >thanks for your review and your constructive comments. here is a new >version of the patch that adresses the issues you brought up. > >> PS: a size(1) would have been nice > >what does size(1) mean? a patch with zero impact on the size of the >binary? if desired i can add a config option for the timeout >parameter
I ment the size output from before and after your patch. Ideally every patch would reduce the total size, regardless whether the patch adds or removes a feature, but that's of course not (always) possible. I don't think a config option for the timeout makes sense. Thanks for the updated patch, i'll test and apply it soon (unless somebody beats me to it). If you experience size-increase with using "quiet" instead of looking at opt (i didn't try), then please follow-up. cheers, _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
