Yes I think it's much better Thanks
Sébastien Chrétien a écrit : > Yes I think it's much better > > Thanks > > Sébastien Chrétien a écrit : >> Yes I think it's much better >> >> Thanks >> >> walter harms a écrit : >>> >>> >>> Denys Vlasenko schrieb: >>>> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 22:29, Sébastien Chrétien wrote: >>>>> walter understands my problem >>>> >>>> Currently it looks like this: >>>> >>>> CC coreutils/cksum.o >>>> AR coreutils/lib.a >>>> LINK busybox_unstripped >>>> Trying libraries: crypt m >>>> Library crypt is not needed, excluding it >>>> Library m is needed, can't exclude it (yet) >>>> Final link with: m >>>> Custom linker script 'busybox_ldscript' found, using it >>>> >>>> >>>> Does this sound unambiguous enough? >>>> -- >>>> vda >>> >>> IMHO this is much better than the original. >>> i guess the user (sebastien) would also like to see; >>> >>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_STATIC),y) >>> echo "you have now a stand-alone binary <busybox>" >>> >>> >>> re, >>> wh >>> >> > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
