On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 06:56:21PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > >I changed my mind about that, as emacs21 cperl-mode does not suffer of > >this and neither does emacs22. Still, this is a short example of what I > >think is a more obvious/better special character protection: > > > >- $text =~ s/SKIP_\w+\(.*?"\s*\)//sxg; > >+ $text =~ s/SKIP_\w+\(.*?\"\s*\)//sxg; > > my copy of vi(m) gets it right, so if current emacs gets it right too, > i suggest to leave it alone..
Right. > If you're really bored then let me point you to ./TODO :P I'm not _that_ bored :). I'll have a look, but no promisses. > I suggest ar write-support ff. Hmm... So you have your own wishlist :) > have fun, > Bernhard Yes. You too :) Cheers, -- Cristian _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
