On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:54:59PM +0200, walter harms wrote: > hi list, > i tried to understand the halt code and found it hard because #ifdef > obvouscated > a lot of the code. I moved the wtmp stuff into its own function what made it > easy > for #ifdef.
So, did that increase the size of the applet? output of size(1), please. > > can someone take a look at the #ifdef magic for RB_HALT_SYSTEM ? > 1. it seems RB_HALT is only used by netbsd. > 2. init.c should have the same problem but simply defines RB_HALT_SYSTEM > when not found. > > IMHO 2. is not clever. > > 1. both sould use the same code (= move to platform.h) or drop it > 2. init should fail. if the value for RB_HALT_SYSTEM is wrong for a system > user will become crasy why searching the bug (and halt is not used often) an #else #error no idea how to RB_HALT_SYSTEM should do the trick. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
