Denys Vlasenko schrieb:
> On Friday 19 September 2008 18:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The patch provides:
>>
>> * drifted to linked list to hold services: -100 bytes.
>
> But this is likely to require more memory at runtime?
>
> + service_t *sv = malloc(sizeof(service_t));
> + memset(sv, 0, sizeof(service_t));
> + if (!sv) {
>
is calloc() broken ?
re,
wh
> if sv == NULL, this will segfault.
>
>
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
