On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:45:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >====================================================================== >http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4944
>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > bernhardf - 09-24-08 00:21 >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >I would strongly suggest to make sure that we can use minilzo instead of >the rather big "normal" lzo. > >For reference: >http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git?a=blob_plain;f=package/lzo_mini/lzo_mini.mk;hb=HEAD [] >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > vda - 09-29-08 15:45 >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >(add/remove: 61/0 grow/shrink: 6/0 up/down: 16807/0) Total: 16807 >bytes > >I think lzo2 itself should be busyboxed. 16kb+ is twice the size of >busybox's bzip2 implementation. see above _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
