Rob Landley escreveu: > > Look: Linux has been under GPLv2 for _seventeen_years_. The license is not > exactly new and untested. Busybox is under the same license as the Linux > kernel for a _reason_.
So... if someone needs a proprietary licence for Busybox, it will most certainly be to run on a *proprietary licened Linux*... quite absurd!!! I have followed this thread and nowhere I have seen two important points: 1) a GPLed software like Busybox can be used in a proprietary product, as long as not linked at all with the proprietary part. Even in an embedded it can be used. 2) Why is this person (I don't remember how the thread started) need a proprietary licece at all, instead of simply following the guidelines and use Linux+Busybox for free? just my 2c, Alain _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
