2008/10/21 Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Has anyone ever actually _needed_ to statically link libm but leave libc
> dynamically linked? Anyone?
I've not needed it. I've libc on the (Debian/Ubuntu) ramdisk because some
programs on the ramdisk are dynamically linked and I've compiled busybox
with "nearly everything on" (I hate when I have a problem not having the
tools to understand it) so I need libm as well but for this single program.
I'm ready to think that this is a pathological case (I'm ready to
think that *I*
am pathological, if need be).
Thanks,
Loïc
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
