On Sunday 26 October 2008 13:09:59 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> If the desire to do read-write-read type accesses
> without having to run devmeme thrice, I guess
> fourth argument may be used

Running it twice doesn't seem like a big deal to me.  A fourth argument is 
just complication, unless you want to iterate through an arbitrary number of 
command line arguments in order, each specifying a read or a write to do 
next.  (Doing a for loop on argv[] isn't a big deal, and it's even guaranteed 
to be null terminated...)

Rob

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to