On Thursday 30 October 2008 12:00:12 walter harms wrote: > it should also be added to kconfig info text. > > we should think about some cleaning of kconfig, > putting daemons and clients in different dirs etc.
Actually there should probably be a libbb function to do the socket() and accept() stuff which takes a function pointer to something to handle() each incoming connection. That way any busybox server could either run standalone or run from whatever you're calling xinetd this week. Just a thought... Rob _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
