I have been following this... Why dont you just let the last byte allways empty?? So thet you will have a spare byte... This will surely produce a spare byte?
Just my 2c, Alain Cathey, Jim escreveu: > It still looks to me like iac_safe_write() > could emit extra FF's if the socket was nearly > full and the first safe_write of the two FF's > only accepted one. The thing would break out, > but with a zero advance of the buffer pointer, > coming back around to do it all again. Resulting > in at least one extra FF in the stream at that > point. > > -- Jim > > > > > _______________________________________________ > busybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox > > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
