On Saturday 15 November 2008 14:48:16 walter harms wrote: > my (only) point was that we should not release SW that needs a ulibc > version (a supported libc!) that is not yet released.
It _is_ out. It was released the _following_day_, it was explicitly _scheduled_ to be released over a week earlier, and the previous month had seen three working -rc versions you could use if you really needed to. If that's your only point, it's not much of a point. Rob _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
