> > > ...rathole when mount becomes _stateful_ utility. Do we need more > quirks...? > > It's not a quirk, it's needed :) > BSD man pages state that -a will ignore entries that already appear to be > mounted. > core. Although the linux man pages don't state this, the behavior of GNU > mount from > util-linux is the same.
Again we need to clarify what BB conforms to, right? So the subsequent mount -a in the > boot scripts needs to avoid re-mounting /proc as it's already mounted. Why mount -a? # mountpoint -q /proc || mount /proc will do, much clearer, no?. Where is UNIX way? mount _is_ already overloaded enough. May be CONFIG_FEATURE? Not insisting though, -- Vladimir
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
