On Thursday 19 February 2009 09:00, Alexander Griesser wrote: > Another thing I found out while walking through the CMOS options of > these thinclients: They had a floppy drive configured although none > was there, so I tried to disable it in the CMOS et voila: The timeout > is gone. > > So the CMOS definetly was configured wrong, but the question about > why busybox' blkid behaves differently is still unanswered.
Because busybox's blkid is very differently implemented. I am much interested in results from the test program. You are saying all opens failed. Do they succeed if you remove O_NONBLOCK? What does it print in that case? -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
