>
> terminating inetd does not terminate any services already started by
> inetd. I guess this is by design?
> What is the preferred way to terminate such services?
>
> Jocke
So I noticed this in xinetd's man page:
SIGTERM terminates all running servers before terminating
xinetd.
This implies that inetd should terminate all services when receiving a
TERM.
bb, v1.12.2, inetd doesn't do that so I think that a bug in bb
Jocke
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
