On Thursday 12 March 2009 04:30:41 pm Sergio wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm using two different (version) cross-compilers for a PPC board. One of > them compiles a BB with a problem in the alias builtin command. > > The BB sources and configuration are absolutely the same on both PC. > > These are two outputs, the first from the working one: > > *** working *** > PMFU_1:~/bb # alias > la='ls -la' > PMFU_1:~/bb # > PMFU_1:~/bb # la > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 1 01:42 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Jan 1 01:42 .. > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 309912 Jan 1 01:27 busybox-ko > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 313084 Jan 1 01:34 busybox-ok > PMFU_1:~/bb # > PMFU_1:~/bb # la /bin/busybox > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 313084 Jan 1 01:57 /bin/busybox > PMFU_1:~/bb # > > **** not working **** > PMFU_1:~/bb # alias > la='ls -la' > PMFU_1:~/bb # > PMFU_1:~/bb # la > ls: invalid option -- . > BusyBox v1.13.3 (2009-03-12 14:43:18 CET) multi-call binary > > Usage: ls [-1AacCdeilnRrSsTtuvwxXk] [filenames...] > > PMFU_1:~/bb # ls -la > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jan 1 01:42 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Jan 1 01:42 .. > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 309912 Jan 1 01:27 busybox-ko > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 313084 Jan 1 01:34 busybox-ok
Woohoo. run "make shell/ash.s" with both compilers and try to see what's different in ash.s. Post the ash.s files to the list. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
