On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 17:53 +0300, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote: > Sure! I recall ago I sent a patch that block "oem" string in crond.c > if BB sendmail is chosen in config. That patch was NAKed... > > Besides, BB sendmail had -i option in the past, it was removed by the > last clearance patch (circa March). There was a discussion about which > compatibility options should BB sendmail support. Ones told one, > others other. It seems there is no free letter (for option) in latin > that sendmail shouldn't support :)
I don't really care how it is done but i would like that cron can send emails with either busybox sendmail, ssmtp or postfix without a recompile. > Will anyone on the list take care of making clear statement on it? For > to me, existing BB sendmail works just fine. Its Denys' job to do so. -nc > > Best regards, > -- > Vladimir > > 2009/10/1, Natanael Copa <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 17:48 +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote: > >> > sendmail: invalid option -- i > >> > >> Try replacing line #96 of sendmail.c: > >> opts = getopt32(argv, "tf:o:w:H:S:a::", &opt_from, NULL, &timeout, > >> &opt_connect, &opt_connect, &list); > >> with > >> opts = getopt32(argv, "tf:o:w:H:S:a::i", &opt_from, NULL, &timeout, > >> &opt_connect, &opt_connect, &list); > >> > >> Regards, > > > > Before I even try that, miscutils/crond.c has this: > > > > #ifndef SENDMAIL_ARGS > > #define SENDMAIL_ARGS "-ti", "oem" > > #endif > > > > will sendmail be able to handle that "oem"? I doubt it. Maybe we should > > change that in cron too, to "-oem"? (googling tells me its an exim > > thing?) > > > > We probably need to fix both. > > > >> -- > >> Vladimir > > > > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
