On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 29 September 2009 20:41:41 Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 23:18, Rob Landley wrote: >> > On Tuesday 29 September 2009 04:01:12 Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > An easy way to find all dead symlinks under /path is: >> > > > >> > > > find -follow -type l /path >> > > > >> > > > Using gnu find, that will produce a list of symlinks that, when >> > > > you've followed them as far as they can, are still symlinks. Using >> > > > busybox, it finds the same set of files, but instead of listing them >> > > > to stdout it gives error messages about them. This behavior is less >> > > > useful. >> > > >> > > Please try attached patch. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > vda >> > >> > It's full of unrelated changes that conflict with the last release >> > version: >> > >> > Applying >> > /home/landley/firmware/firmware/sources/patches/busybox-findl.patch >> > patching file findutils/find.c >> >> Can you try to apply just this to 1.15.1? >> >> http://busybox.net/downloads/fixes-1.15.1/busybox-1.15.1-find.patch >> >> It is planned to go into 1.15.2 > > the posted patch isnt entirely correct. it didnt protect the zeroing of the > new xdev vals when xdev support is turned off. ive fixed the patch on the > server, but it seems the 1.15 branch isnt being kept up to date with the > posted patches, so you'll have to take care of this when git is finally > updated.
Thanks. My plan is to update branches with all accumulated patches only just before next bugfix release. Thus, current 1_15_x branch in git should be just unmodified 1.15.1, unless someone other than me committed something. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
