>Does 'i' _have to_ be int32_t? Once upon a time it was understood that raw 'int' (including any aliases) was the most natural data size for the processor in question, which usually resulted in the smallest and most efficient code. That's what you'd use for all loop indices, etc. Has this changed? Of course, compilers didn't try to do lint's job back then, either.
-- Jim _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
