> Speaking of ftp.. Does anybody else find it bloated to have at least two > FTP talkers, one in wget and another one in ftpgetput? ;)
My situation: a task to periodically fetch the content of M$Exchange mailbox via HTTP. BB wget can't be used -- it has no out-of-box support for cookies. I invented the workaround: first "strace -f -v -s1024 -o dump wget <request>", then parse dump file for Set-Cookie: headers, then add headers to the next wget call. Been thinking to develop a patch, but used vanilla wget instead. So I use no BB wget -- and that's a pity -- thus one ftp talker (which's _way_ unfriendly). And what about "wput" :) -- Vladimir _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
