On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:26:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:25:24PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>>On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:15:43PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>>>GNU tar-1.22 handles 'o' as no-same-owner only on extract, >>>>on create, 'o' would be --old-archive. >>> >>>FYI this was prompted by: >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> >>> >>>diff -rdup git-1.6.5.oorig/templates/Makefile git-1.6.5/templates/Makefile >>>--- git-1.6.5.oorig/templates/Makefile 2009-10-11 03:42:04.000000000 >>>+0200 >>>+++ git-1.6.5/templates/Makefile 2009-10-23 21:43:06.000000000 +0200 >>>@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ clean: >>> install: all >>> $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)' >>> (cd blt && $(TAR) cf - .) | \ >>>- (cd '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)' && umask 022 && $(TAR) xfo -) >>>+ (cd '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)' && umask 022 && $(TAR) x >>>--no-numeric-owner -f -) >> >> argh, sorry! --no-same-owner of course. > >Either way, your change would break non-GNU tar implementations that are >properly POSIX.1, isn't it?
I suppose xf - -o would work? _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
