On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:48:22 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Tuesday 03 November 2009 11:38, Cristian Zamfir wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Monday 02 November 2009 12:55:52 Cristian Zamfir wrote: > > >> I have been trying to find some bug reports from July-August 2008. > > >> For instance, bug http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=4544 that is > > >> described here > > >> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2008-August/ > > >> 066760.html , but > > >> also some older bugs. > > >> Unfortunately, it seems that those bug reports are no longer > > >> available > > >> in Bugzilla, the oldest bug is from December 2008. > > >> Is it still possible to access those bug reports? > > > > > > the mantis db was semi-lost during the upgrade. some people (people > > > who have > > > access to the actual busybox hosting) have private copies of the old > > > db, but i > > > dont believe there are any public places. > > > -mike > > > > If it is not a big hassle, it would be great if I can take a look at > > such a private copy of the db. At least the part of the db that has > > entries from July-August 2008. I would like to take a look at these > > bugs for my research. > > There were only about 40 open bugs against bbox. > > Khem Raj might have it.
http://landley.net/mantis/ That was a quick and dirty "call wget a lot to fetch static pages" with a sed to clean up the local links. I didn't get any of the attachments. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
