On Sunday 08 November 2009 08:57, Dan Fandrich wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 04:04:00PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > Since you asked, my thoughts are "oh please no". Let's not open this can > > of > > worms. Busybox is not a C library, it's not a kernel, and those are NOT > > OUR > > JOB. > > I agree that we shouldn't be reimplementing gnulib, but on the other hand > busybox is expected to run on a variety of systems. I don't think it > should be an issue supplying replacement functions for the handful of > nonportable functions that have been identified.
Set CONFIG_USE_BB_PWD_GRP=y and it will be supplied by libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c Alternatively, exclude the only applet, id, where getgrouplist is used. Any libc which has support for network and/or database storage for users/groups will need to have getgrouplist() anyway, since emulating it by looping through all groups via setgrent/getgrent/endgrent may be very expensive. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
