On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 08:54, Michael Abbott wrote: > > My other thought is that the error message should be filtered on the > > verbose flag, which is what util-linux does. Here is a patch for that: > Applied, thanks. Thanks.
> BTW, did you actually tested that it works for you now? Yes, it works a treat :) > > Do you have any feeling for when there will be a 1.15.3 release? > > Version .2 has suddenly acquired a lot of patches! > This weekend? > > A note on the patch directory > > (http://busybox.net/downloads/fixes-1.15.2/). There is no way to tell > > what order the patches need to be applied, perhaps there ought to be a > > sequence number after the version number? Also, there is no > > description on each patch of what it does: it would really help, if > > nothing else, to add the associated commit message to the patch, or > > the appropriate snippet from the e-mail that generated it. > > > > Of course, mostly the patches don't overlap, so maybe my query about > > sequence number is immaterial. However another strange note is that > > every time a new patch is added the "Last modified" date updates for > > all patches (to the same date), so it's hard for me to spot which ones > > are new (and of course, if the date was sensible, I could use that for > > ordering). > > I do not plan to pile up so many patches that these considerations are > important. If you ask these questions, it means it's definitely time for > 1.15.3 :) Heh. Sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
