On Tuesday 04 May 2010 16:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:41:00PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > >dump_procs - 353 +353 > > recursive_action() ?
It does not fit well. We do not traverse the tree in depth, we just want to do "cat /proc/[1-9]*/stat". With recursive_action(), I'd need to force it to stop on level 1. I don't think the code will get smaller. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
