On Thursday 06 May 2010 21:25, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:55:55AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > >commit: > >http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=3945bc15340dc9cfa8aae0164f3baf94db6d40c3 > >branch: http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=refs/heads/master > > > >--- a/include/applets.h > >+++ b/include/applets.h > >@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ IF_TRUE(APPLET_NOFORK(true, true, _BB_DIR_BIN, > >_BB_SUID_DROP, true)) > > IF_TTY(APPLET(tty, _BB_DIR_USR_BIN, _BB_SUID_DROP)) > > IF_TTYSIZE(APPLET(ttysize, _BB_DIR_USR_BIN, _BB_SUID_DROP)) > > IF_TUNCTL(APPLET(tunctl, _BB_DIR_SBIN, _BB_SUID_DROP)) > >-//IF_TUNE2FS(APPLET(tune2fs, _BB_DIR_SBIN, _BB_SUID_DROP)) > >+IF_MKFS_EXT2(APPLET(tune2fs, _BB_DIR_SBIN, _BB_SUID_DROP)) > > huh? > > what are you guys up to?
Should be fixed now, please check current git. > >+++ b/util-linux/tune2fs.c > >@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ > >+/* vi: set sw=4 ts=4: */ > >+/* > >+ * tune2fs: utility to modify EXT2 filesystem > >+ * > >+ * Busybox'ed (2009) by Vladimir Dronnikov <[email protected]> > >+ * > >+ * Licensed under GPLv2, see file LICENSE in this tarball for details. > > will have to be reimplemented for anything that wants "or later". Bad. > > Can anyone explain, _in detail_ what's going on there? What's the theory > behind that? There seems to be no concensus on GPLv2 v "GPLv2 or later". -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
