On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Bob Dunlop wrote:
> With Bash you can avoid placing the while loop in a subshell by pushing
> the source_process out on to the end of a named pipe and reading from
> that.
>
> while
> do
> something
> done < <( source_process )
>
> Unfortunately Ash doesn't support named pipes.
Doesn't this:
while <list>; do
something
done <<-EOF
$(source_process)
EOF
do that in all shells?
Cheers,
--
Cristian
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
