On 09/13/10 03:09, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> ash seems to be buggy (enters into a trap despite it being cleared). > > Don't we all know that? Dash is also buggy, bash too, and hush is not > ready yet :( > > No criticism here. I really _do_ appreciate your work. IMO, there's no > "right" or "wrong". There's only "frustration", "insufficient" and > "usable".
This is what I call a trap for young players. In a few scripts, I've set it up to trap ^C... then found that later when I wanted to disable that trap, it wouldn't unless I executed a subshell. I coded around it assuming I was Doing It Wrong. I take it 'hush' is a future successor to 'ash'? -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) .'''. Gentoo Linux/MIPS Cobalt and Docs Developer '.'` : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.' http://dev.gentoo.org/~redhatter :.' I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
