On Wednesday 08 September 2010 01:40:00 Dan Fandrich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dan Fandrich <[email protected]> > --- > coreutils/ls.c | 4 ++-- > coreutils/tee.c | 8 ++++---- > shell/ash.c | 6 ++++-- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
According to c99: http://busybox.net/~landley/c99-draft.html#7.19.7.8 #2 The putc function is equivalent to fputc, except that if it is implemented as a macro, it may evaluate stream more than once, so that argument should never be an expression with side effects. So why not just convert the putc() calls to fputc() instead of rewriting unrelated code? Rob -- GPLv3: as worthy a successor as The Phantom Menace, as timely as Duke Nukem Forever, and as welcome as New Coke. _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
