On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Tito <[email protected]> wrote: > form libbb.h > > #define bb_path_passwd_file "/etc/passwd" > #define bb_path_shadow_file "/etc/shadow" > #define bb_path_gshadow_file "/etc/gshadow" > #define bb_path_group_file "/etc/group" > > from pwd_grp.c > > #ifndef _PATH_SHADOW > #define _PATH_SHADOW "/etc/shadow" > #endif > #ifndef _PATH_PASSWD > #define _PATH_PASSWD "/etc/passwd" > #endif > #ifndef _PATH_GROUP > #define _PATH_GROUP "/etc/group" > #endif > > > the paths are defined in multiple places and > with CONFIG_USE_BB_PWD_GRP=y > if you change them in libbb.h > the changes are not honoured in pwd_grp.c > SHould be consistent and defined in only one file > for example for testing purposes on local files like: > > #ifdef DEBUG_PWD_GRP > #define bb_path_passwd_file "./passwd" > #define bb_path_shadow_file "./shadow" > #define bb_path_gshadow_file "./gshadow" > #define bb_path_group_file "./group" > #else > #define bb_path_passwd_file "/etc/passwd" > #define bb_path_shadow_file "/etc/shadow" > #define bb_path_gshadow_file "/etc/gshadow" > #define bb_path_group_file "/etc/group" > #endif > > Denys what you think about that?
They are not meant to be configurable. (I believe pwd_grp.c has been taken from uclibc, presumably to make glibc-without-nss builds possible.) -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
