> A better decision would be to write your scrips in 
> standard-compliant shell.

OK, pardon my ignorance then.

It seems to me that the syntax for functions in ash and bash is different
and incompatible.

I had assumed that was a fixed part of the universe, and something I'd
have to live with.

Am I wrong?

D

> If ash or hush handles some standard shell syntax incorrectly,
> report it. If they don't implement something, report it too.
> 
> 
> > I've got everything going with busybox, and I particularly don't 
> > want to
> > find it's all different on a Debian machine.
> 
> In order to avoid problems like this, people invented standards.
> 
> -- 
> vda
> 
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to