> A better decision would be to write your scrips in > standard-compliant shell. OK, pardon my ignorance then. It seems to me that the syntax for functions in ash and bash is different and incompatible. I had assumed that was a fixed part of the universe, and something I'd have to live with. Am I wrong? D > If ash or hush handles some standard shell syntax incorrectly, > report it. If they don't implement something, report it too. > > > > I've got everything going with busybox, and I particularly don't > > want to > > find it's all different on a Debian machine. > > In order to avoid problems like this, people invented standards. > > -- > vda > _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
- Can I set up my own sub-environment? David Collier
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? David Collier
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? Harald Becker
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? Harald Becker
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? David Collier
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment? Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-environment... David Collier
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-enviro... Ralf Friedl
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-en... Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can I set up my own su... David Collier
- RE: Can I set up my own su... Sven-Göran Bergh
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-enviro... Paul Smith
- Re: Can I set up my own sub-en... David Collier
- RE: Can I set up my own su... Sven-Göran Bergh
- Re: Can I set up my own su... Denys Vlasenko
