Hallo Dan! >> ash manpage >>> I completely failed to pick that up last time I looked for it. > Is there any reason this isn't included in the Busybox source package? > ash is probably the most complex applet included, and therefore the most > likely to diverge from any upstream documentation.
I would like to see that one included in the Busybox package too. Especially as neither the Busybox manpage nor any help text say's anything about the features ash. BTW: Shouldn't "busybox ash --help" not give a short summary of invocation options and at least say something like "Standard command interpreter for the system, mostly POSIX compliant." ... and here we could add "(See ash.1 manual page for more information)" ... is anything wrong with this? ... does anybody complain about the extra size this needs? -- Harald _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
