> The best way would be to evolve tovards using data formats > and command-line options which are compatible with relevant > standard tools.
There is no standard as far as keyboard tables go. Every Unix flavour has its own utility. For instance, OpenBSD has 'wsconsctl'. 'loadkeys' is just a well-known tool that manages keyboard tables under Linux, and it is only widely used because nobody ever bothered to design another one. That hardly makes it a standard. Having the same interface as "loadkeys" offers one benefit: busybox can then be used as a drop-in replacement for original loadkeys. This benefit should be compared to the benefit of designing and using a leaner interface, that will not require including a full table parser into the busybox binary. -- Laurent _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
