On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:32:58AM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tend to think that keeping EXTRA_LDFLAGS (or EXTRA_CCLDFLAGS for that 
> matter) would be handy at times.
> The rest lokks good to me.

My patch does, AFAIK, preserve the use of EXTRA_LDFLAGS. I don't
really see a case for EXTRA_CCLDFLAGS because CCLDFLAGS would have an
equivalent functionality to LDFLAGS.

> Acked-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]>

Thanks for the ack :-).

To others,

Is there any reason to persist in directly calling ld instead of using
the compiler driver (gcc)?

Attachment: pgp54CBhkDaxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to