On Thursday 10 March 2011 12:48, Laurent Bercot wrote: > Hi, > > I like hush and don't want to have to switch to ash. > For reliability, I like to run shell scripts via "/bin/sh -e". > However, with hush: > > ----- > sh-2.05b$ /bin/busybox sh -e -c "true" > sh: invalid option -- e > BusyBox v1.18.3 (2011-03-09 18:15:41 CET) multi-call binary. > > No help available. > ----- > > I'd like it if a near-future release of Busybox supported -e in hush.
Me too :D -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
