On Tuesday 26 April 2011 21:34, Blanchette, Sylvie wrote:
> Resending in plain text...
> ________________________________________
> From: Blanchette, Sylvie 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2:40 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: udhcpd listening on all interfaces
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Even though I have setup the interface parameter in udhcpd.conf to eth0, 
> udhcpd still responds to bootp requests coming in on other interfaces on the 
> node and spawns udhcpd processes using up sockets and memory. The list of 
> udhcpd processes and number of sockets used on the system keeps growing over 
> time leading to a kernel panic because we run out of memory.

As far as I know, udhcpd does not spawn children fro every client.

It uses a child process only if notify_file directive is present
in config file.

I don't understand how did you manage to have so many children
udhcpd processes. I need more data.

> Node1:~$ netstat -a
> Active Internet connections (servers and established)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address         State     
>   
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:telnet          0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN    
>   
> tcp        0      0 :::26                   ::%2143958320:*         LISTEN    
>   
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        onw-tpaskara-01.ciena.com:bootpc 
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        onw-tpaskara-01.ciena.com:bootpc 
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        onw-jmagnet-01.ciena.com:bootpc 
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 localhost:bootps        localhost:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.29.89:bootpc       
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.28.81:bootpc       
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.5.2:bootpc         
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.5.13:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.5.13:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:bootps          0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp     1856      0 10.1.5.18:bootps        10.1.5.36:bootpc        
> ESTABLISHED 
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:tftp            0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:snmp            0.0.0.0:*                         
>   
> udp        0      0 :::6161                 ::%2144671120:*                   
>   
> Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
> Proto RefCnt Flags       Type       State         I-Node Path
> ...
> 
> Node1:~$ ps -ef | grep udhcpd
> root      3332     1  0 13:26 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3336     1  0 13:27 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3347     1  0 13:29 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3349     1  0 13:29 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3366     1  0 13:41 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3370     1  0 13:42 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3374     1  0 13:42 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3382     1  0 13:49 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3384     1  0 13:49 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3386     1  0 13:49 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3388     1  0 13:49 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3397     1  0 13:56 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3400     1  0 13:56 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3401     1  0 13:56 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3403     1  0 13:56 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3407     1  0 13:58 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3416     1  0 14:03 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> root      3419     1  0 14:04 ?        00:00:00 udhcpd
> gss       3421  3338  0 14:04 ttyS0    00:00:00 grep udhcpd
> 
> I want to use only the bootp feature of udhcpd on this particular node type 
> in order to boot an intelligent module on that node. The node is not to be 
> used as a DHCP server. The IP address of the port connecting the main board 
> to the intelligent module is fixed.

What do you mean by "want to use only the bootp feature"?

Can you show your .config and udhcpd.conf?

Can you "killall udhcpd", run "strace -f -s99 -tt -oLOG udhcpd -f <other opts>",
reproduce the bug (appearance of a few children) and post LOG file?

Can you reproduce this bug with latest released version - 1.18.4?


> I am in the process of bringing in the latest version of busybox into our 
> image, but it would be nice to know if someone else has observed this issue 
> before and if there is a temporary solution that I can use to work around it.

-- 
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to