On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 07:28:37AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Yes, I think the approach this patch takes is not sustainable. > > History is a small file. If your flash fs and hardware can't cope > even with periodic updates of a small file, then how it copes with > other real-world cases? > > BTW, what about solving it with > "ln -s /tmp/.ash_history-$USERNAME ~/.ash_history" ?
Or, what about just setting a large buffer on the history file stream with setbuffer()? >>> Dan _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
