On 08/27/2011 09:04 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Thursday 25 August 2011 00:29, Ian Wienand wrote:
ping on this ... I still think there's no valid reason to create a
pidfile with 666 permissions.
Can't use set proper umask?
I can, but I believe the standard way for a daemon to run is to set
its umask to zero & explicitly set file permissions internally -- so
it doesn't rely on an external umask and possibly end up writing
world-writable pid files, for example.
Someone else said they rely on the behaviour and it is not a huge
issue for me.
-i
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
